mt019816@ohio.edu
Journalism is an ever evolving practice.
Across modes, across methods, across times. Yet as Kovach and Rosenstiel note,
there seems to remain a single strand that runs through the history of
journalistic practice, that of providing people with knowledge so that they can
make their own decisions.
To express this idea, many have proposed ways to
ensure this golden aim can be upheld, such as having coverage that is balanced
and fair to all sides, or that the press has the ability to be critical of the
government. It’s interesting to see how these goals have developed over time,
alongside the development of nations and schools of thought. One place some of
these can dawn from, is Roman orator and political figure, Cato.
Image via The Louve |
It would be eight years later that
two London newspapermen, John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, would publish their
own series of papers, under the synonym of Cato, “condemning corruption and
lack of morality with the British political system and warning against
tyranny”. (Hamowy, 1995) They felt that “truth should be a defense against
libel”, which was radical for the time, as English common law held that any criticism
of the government was a crime. (Kovach and Rosnstiel, 23)
Like Addison, Tenchard and Gordon, many saw
parallels between Cato’s struggles and their own. A few of these people, ended
up being founding figures for a new state: America. George Washington and
Benjamin Franklin were among those who were very familiar with these writings,
and felt a connection to the ideas of liberty and justness, especially as
“discontent against the English Crown was growing”. (Kovach and Rosenstiel, 23)
The ideas presented by the various ‘Catos’
became so influential, they even showed up in the First Amendment on the
Bill of Right’s: upholding freedom of speech, and championing a free press.
Image via Wikipedia |
When looking at the purposes of journalism,
many of them are reflected by Cato. The media is a place of discussion and
information, of which, it can empower people to choose for themselves. By
operating as an objective entity, and adhering to a high sense of morals, it
can ensure it has the responsibility to match its power, and earn people’s
trust through the strength of its character.
Sources:
John
Trenchard and Thomas Gordon. Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and
Other Important Subjects. ed. and annotated by Ronald Hamowy. 2 vols.
(Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 1995). The standard modern edition.
Cato the Younger.
W. Heinemann, 1919. p. 249.
Kovach,
B., & Rosenstiel, T. (n.d.). The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople
Should Know and the Public Should Expect (Revised and Updated 3rd Edition
ed.).
Very interesting. I've never heard of Cato but I believe you have just started me down a literature path, thank you. I'm glad there are some institutes which are trying to aim for such a level of integrity. My issue is, when being honest is a willful decision, how many people really, are going to take the high road?
ReplyDeleteAwesome read.
Juan Guevara
jg808618@ohio.edu
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDon't be fooled, Juan! The Cato Institute is just another conservative/right-wing mouthpiece financed by big corporations and people with deep pockets. As if we don't already have enough Heritage Foundations and American Enterprise Institutes in this country....
ReplyDeleteRossen Vassilev Jr.
rv727716@ohio.edu