Thursday, September 30, 2021

Black death is not a commodity.


When Black people are killed by the police, the images of their deaths go viral. The graphic photos and videos spread on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and news broadcasts in a matter of minutes. 

One benefit of tragedy's exponential spread on social media means that more people will see it, and perhaps people will be held accountable because of it. However, the constant reply of Black death can not only desensitize society, but traumatize Black people. 

 The SPJ Code of Ethics prioritizes one code above all else: seek truth and report it. What happens if that truth is exploited for clicks and ratings?

According to an article by Monnica T. Williams, a clinical psychologist and the director of the Center for Mental Health Disparities at the University of Louisville, racism can cause PTSD-like symptoms. She said Black people are surrounded by reminders of race-related danger.

"We might see clips on the nightly news featuring unarmed African Americans being killed on the street, in a holding cell, or even in a church. Learning of these events brings up an array of painful racially-charged memories, and what has been termed “vicarious traumatization," she said in an article for Psychology Today. "Even if the specific tragic news item has never happened to us directly, we may have had parents or aunts who have had similar experiences, or we know people in our community who have, and their stories have been passed down."

When Derek Chauvin killed George Floyd, the video of the horrific incident was replayed on the nightly news over and over again. Who is in charge of lining up that footage for an evening broadcast? 

Melanye Price, a political scientist that focuses on contemporary black politics, public opinion and public rhetoric, wrote an opinion story for The New York Times asking people to stop sharing the video of George Floyd's death.

"These videos are necessary not only because they generate outrage among whites, outrage that is ever-present for African-Americans. But also because the political leaders empowered to stop this are not outraged enough," Price said.

"I don’t know if it’s ethical, though, to repeatedly show and share what are essentially snuff films with African-American protagonists."

Price said if white people and non-Black people need to watch videos of Black death over and over again to believe Black people are brutalized, they either refuse to learn or are "content with the violence."

Journalists should be wary of over sharing content that would re-traumatize Black people and contribute to more distress from racism. 

Tuesday, September 28, 2021

Visual Violation and Mistrust

 Cameron Robertson

cr102019@ohio.edu


With this generation being so dependent on technological advancements, newsrooms have quickly had to adapt as well. News has become more easily distributed with things such as phones and social media, but this change has also put an emphasis on expressing news visually too. A lot of the time when viewing news on apps like Instagram or Twitter, it is accompanied by a photo or video that is the most important piece.

I can think of hundreds of examples when I saw a piece of news that was contained to an image or video on an app like Twitter. Often, they have no accompanying context besides a quick sentence or two, leaving me to form my own conclusion from the visual. While visuals are great for getting news out there, the negatives that can come with situations like this can be heavy.

Source: Dennis Dunleavy

The first potential negative with visual imagery in news is photo manipulation. Take this example of the TIME cover featuring O.J. Simpson's mugshot vs the NewsWeek cover of the same photo. The photos are much different in the two covers, despite being the exact same. That's because the TIME cover has been altered to make the context and the tone to appear even darker than the original story suggests.

This is the problem that exists. When big media companies are able to use photo manipulation to alter or push a certain context, it can lead the readers or consumers of information in a certain direction. As ethical journalists, the goal is not to lead people to conclusions, but to simply present the facts and let the public conclude what they may. 


As seen in this article by Neiman Reports, another problem deals with graphic imagery in news. Often, major news will have to cover tragic stories, especially in this day and age. This leads to very graphic and heartbreaking images that are both iconic and questionable. It calls into question which need is greater: to use the images to drive the importance of the news, or to not use the images in order to avoid the graphic nature pushing people away.


The last issue deals with video manipulation, highlighted in this article from The Atlantic. Just like with photos, videos can be manipulated even more to construct certain narratives. The framing and length of videos can lead the public to draw certain conclusions from the situations even though that may not be the truth. Not only that, but video editing such as "deepfakes" can cast even more doubt on videos truth and validity. 

I think that visuals are great and are effective in the conveying of news and information, but these potential negatives certainly need to be addressed and the public needs to be informed to try and eliminate the negatives. With social media, visuals are only going to become more commonplace in news, and it is our duty as journalists to try and curb the negatives that can come along with them.

A world minutes from manipulation

 Wesley Minke

wm598119@ohio.edu

wesleym1211@icloud.com

Source: https://twitter.com/pfpicardi/status/977959864042491905?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E977959864042491905%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ffirstdraftnews.org%2Farticles%2Fhow-journalists-can-responsibly-report-on-manipulated-pictures-and-video%2F


    In the world today, with the media in the position that it is forced into, people must make quick decisions and choose to either believe something, or take time and potentially lose a big story. In this process, mistakes get made, and sometimes deep fakes are not detected. All in all this just leads to more and more mistakes with the media around the world, causing more mistrust amongst the nation, and all viewers of these news outlets. 
    
    In our culture with the technology we have in our power it is made easier for people to get "exposed", when in reality they may not have done anything or played any part in whatever might have happened. Which is why as NiemanLab says, we need to examine the source to find out where it started.

    If we do our due diligence on stories that may seem fake, and find them to be fake, we can cut them off before they gain enough traction. However, the reverse is also true, if we promote something without checking its factuality, it may lose us, or our news outlets, all reliability or credibility for seeking the truth and reporting it. 



    The Atlantic also goes on to show us how viral videos cannot be trusted in some circumstances. When some high school kids were going on a March for Life, they ran into a March for Indigenous Peoples that was taking place on the same day. In the videos many different messages are conveyed, and disrespect from the high school students is what many thought was taking place. 

    When you take a deeper dive while watching these videos, you have to learn how to be able to find the correct information from the right camera angles to tell the most true story. With all the information we are able to consume in today's era, we need to take it a step farther. It is our job to hold the world accountable for information that is spread around the world. Whether accurate or not is the job we are handed as consumers of mass media, to decide for ourselves whether we want to believe it or not. 

    So, this should be a call to action for our world. Take you time, read everything from multiple outlets or angles, and do your due diligence on everything you read. Hold everyone and everything accountable, because that is the only way our issue of fake news can ever be fixed. When we finally gain full faith in our media again, we will finally have the ability to truly trust what we see.

Monday, September 27, 2021

It's Not What It Looks Like

Avery Ovens 

ao138618@ohio.edu

averyovenss@gmail.com


A picture was taken of Kendall Jenner with her hands in the air. Someone took that photo and photoshopped a mask on her face along with a Black Lives Matter poster between her hands making it look like she was holding it up. The picture went viral due to the shadow showing there was no poster making Kendall look like she edited it herself to make people believe she was protesting for the BLM movement. There was so much controversy around this that it got Kendall's attention. She tweeted that she did not post that picture and was not responsible for photoshopping it.

Visual media such as attached images and video recordings have been such a savior to journalists helping to bring support and credibility to their claims. So many stories and arguments are able to be backed up with the help of a visual as proof that the information readers are receiving is trustworthy. But technology has advanced itself much further allowing visual media to be tampered with displaying something untrue. A certain type of this manipulated content is known as a deepfake.

A deepfake is an edit made on a photo or video that swaps the faces of people. This term uses multiple different techniques such as face swap, lip sync, facial reenactment, and motion transfer. These techniques all work together to make someone look like someone else doing or saying something they were not originally. It is so well detailed that it can be hard to tell if the content is real or deepfaked. Kendall Jenner was accused of photoshopping which is not a deepfake but a way of editing an image to portray something else which correlates to the point of a deepfake. 

https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/11/how-the-wall-street-journal-is-preparing-its-journalists-to-detect-deepfakes/

This type of manipulated content is something that is harder to detect because visual media, especially videos, have been seen as credible support until recently.  The public is aware of fake news as well as pictures being edited, but deepfaking has changed peoples perception and trust in videos. All manipulated content is based upon genuine pictures or videos so when it gets altered it is not necessarily fake, but it turns into disinformation based upon the edits made. Different ways of editing can change the way a story is portrayed; therefore, journalists are in charge of covering these manipulations so they can continue fulfilling their number one priority in helping to guide the public to be informed only on the truth. It is said to not believe everything you read on the internet, but now it should be said to not believe everything you see on the internet.

https://firstdraftnews.org/articles/how-journalists-can-responsibly-report-on-manipulated-pictures-and-video/

Visual Violence and the Right for Truth

Amber Phipps 
amphipps.1102@gmail.com 

Visual media has the capabilities of offering something that words can't always express. Photography and photojournalists have changed the ways by which the average citizen interprets the world around them. Visuals provide the world with information that can be interpreted at a deeper level of understanding due to how easy it is to view and process an image. Visuals in the media can become ethical dilemmas in the case of disasters and graphic material that divides our understanding into what is and isn't acceptable based on facts and courtesy of viewers. 

Some may argue that the world has the right to know the truth of every situation, no matter how heart-wrenching. There's also the argument that states how the privacy of the victims and the severity of the situation should be prevented from the public eye due to the effect it may have on viewers and victims.  

Photojournalism offers the public something that words simply can't achieve in specific situations. Providing a visual creates an emotional tie between the event and the viewer, and this is something that shouldn't be overlooked. Having disasters and graphic material such as suffering individuals provides the public with the truth that happens in the world outside of our lives. 
It's necessary to be aware of these events that occur in order to properly bring attention to deaths and disasters and provide the victims with recognition for what they've experienced. Providing the public with these types of visuals may help prevent those specific disasters from happening again due to the knowledge they've gained from the media.



When it comes to publishing these graphic visuals, it's important to establish the lines of what's ethical and what pushes the limitations of what's acceptable and respectful to place in the media. Too often has the media jumped on a story covering difficult events which later resulted in more harm than good for the victims and their families. The reasoning behind publishing these images should never be overlooked because the intentions of the media must be based upon respect for the victims and the best interests of the public.

Vividly graphic photos that made it in the news are a significant aspect of our history and shouldn't be overlooked due to their content. While there might not be a cookie-cutter list of guidelines to follow when determining what photos should be published for the sake of documentation and historical purposes, the victims must always be considered and recognized. Does publishing graphic images pose more harm than necessary? It's difficult to say depending on the situation and those involved. With each situation that arises, the most important thing a journalist can do is review ethical codes, determine the effect that the publication could potentially cause, and always take into account the victims and their families. 


Are Graphic Images Necessary in Informing the Public on Pressing Issues?

 Kevin McIntyre

km675818@ohio.edu

kevinmcin11@gmail.com

It is a journalist's responsibility to deliver news in the most effective and straightforward way. While doing this, however, it is extremely important that the content is being delivered to the public in an ethical way. According to the Society of Professional Journalists' (SPJ) website, an ethical journalist should, "Balance the public's need for information against potential harm or discomfort." 

Original photo taken by Kerstin Langenberger

There is a very fine line between an image that is powerful, effective, and harmless to the public and an image that is graphic and unnecessary to the understanding of a situation. It is often difficult, however, to discern whether an image is effective in driving forward a story or if it is simply inappropriate. 

There have been numerous cases in the history of photojournalism in which a photographer or a news outlet has received criticism for publishing sensitive images. One example of a photo that has divided audiences in the past comes from a series known as "Immersions," by photographer Andres Serrano 

In this series, Serrano photographs several different religious icons submerged in liquid. The most notable and controversial photographs are the ones that include a crucifix submerged in Serrano's urine. Audiences have expressed their opinions on the matter on both sides of the argument; one being that the photos are an expression of one's beliefs and the other being that the images are blasphemous, crude and inappropriate. 

There are many examples of controversial images that have come from the topic of war. This subject can be very powerful due to its violent and grotesque nature, which is also why it can often be so difficult to determine whether or not images of war should be available to the public. An example of this decision can be seen in the work of James Nachtwey, who covered the Somalian famine and civil war in 1992. 

Nachtwey's images covered the effects of war, rather than the war itself. During the time of this famine and civil war, over 200,000 Somalis lost their lives. One of Nachtwey's most famous images shows an extremely malnourished and starving woman in a wheelbarrow. This image was published to bring publicity to the extremely important issue that was going on in Somalia, and to encourage foreign aid. 

This is an example of what photojournalism, especially on sensitive subject matter, should aim to do. The photo was not taken to alienate or humiliate anyone, nor was it taken simply to disturb viewers. It was taken to inform the public on an important matter, and it did so in a way that words simply could not. It is a subject that can be very dividing and often subjective, but if journalists continue to consider all of the outcomes of their actions and minimize harm in any way they can, we will continue to see powerful images presented in an ethical manner. 

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Spotting manipulation in content

Charlene Pepiot

Charlene.Pepiot1.@gmail.com

The age of the internet and Photoshop has allowed almost anyone to manipulate content and pass it off as being real. Depending on the editor's skill level, manipulated photos can be easy to spot, such as a Flordia high school's poor attempt to cover female students' cleavage or the so-called destruction of the Lincoln Memorial following protests over George Floyd's death in 2020. However, more advanced manipulation can be difficult to differentiate from what is real to the untrained eye. Here are some tips to help spot fake imagery.

Original image from TMZ.com

According to Niemanlab, deepfakes are based on a machine learning technique that can swap the features of two people--often a politician and an actor, and through a combination of lip-syncing, face swapping, and facial reenactments, can give the illusion that the politician is falsely speaking or doing something, such as the Queen of England dancing to Gotye's "Somebody that I Used to Know". Despite the real look of deepfakes, running them through video editing software and looking for alterations, such as differences in skin tone, inconsistent lighting, and a stretching neck, can help pick out the fake from the real. 

Deepfakes are also usually created with preexisting footage, so searching for the original online through Google Image Search or Tineye and watching it alongside the alleged deepfake can help you discern if parts were manipulated.

The audio of a video can also be altered, such as making politicians sound sluggish and drunk by altering an audio's pitch and manipulating its speed. In such cases, it is important to use the aforementioned Google Image Search and Tineye to find preexisting clips with the audio and compare them to find any differences.

No matter the content, checking the source that uploaded it can shed light on its validity Facebook posts and other social media uploads are not verified before publication, and their accessibility can make them spread quickly and be taken as truth. This can be especially problematic when other noteworthy news sources pick up these fake stories and bring attention to them. 

It is important to remember that thousands of reshares do not equal accuracy or truth. Always make sure to find the content's original uploader and make sure it is from a reliable source. Websites that end in ".gov" and ".edu" are generally considered credible, for instance. Doing so will help filter out the content that is manipulated and what is fake news from what is real. 


Are Graphic Visuals Ethical?

 Autum Meyers

autummeyers33@gmail.com 






Everyone knows that manipulated visuals such as deepfakes are highly unethical and deceptive to the public. Everyone also knows that tools like photoshop can be misleading and can cause viewers to see our imperfect world through a perfectly edited lens. For the most part, we as a society agree that these tools can be unethical, and we are taught to be wary of visuals in our media because of them. Even journalists are taught how to carefully report on and be wary of manipulated content so that it does not deceive anyone any further. 

https://firstdraftnews.org/articles/how-journalists-can-responsibly-report-on-manipulated-pictures-and-video/

However, it can be harder to figure out what kind of images are ethical or unethical when it comes to graphic imagery. Journalists struggle to find a balance between their moral obligations to the public at large and their obligations to the people being photographed in these moments of great sadness. 

Many people argue that journalists have an obligation to share information and make an impact on people by showing them what is really happening in the world; they feel that the only way to properly do that is by sharing graphic visuals. Others argue that these graphic pictures are too invasive of the people being photographed and the people who are close to them. Who would want their loved one's final moments to be captured on camera and uploaded for everyone in the world to see? 

As described in the article "How Newsrooms Handle Graphic Images of Violence" sharing graphic content truly is an ethical dilemma of violation versus validation. Are we violating these people's privacy and personal sufferings or are we validating their experiences and shedding light on the wrongness within our society so that we can learn and grow in the future?

https://niemanreports.org/articles/how-newsrooms-handle-graphic-images-of-violence/

For me personally, I don't have an answer. I can see both sides too clearly.

 Take the picture from 9/11 of the Falling Man. I learned at a very young age that during 9/11 many people jumped out of the buildings to try and escape the fire, and fell to their deaths. I always thought this fact was sad, but it wasn't until I saw the picture of the Falling Man that it really hit me how tragic this day was for our country. The picture of the Falling Man had an impact on me that a fact from a textbook could never have. I truly believe that graphic pictures make us think deeply about our world and what we can do to make it better, and to me that is ethical. 

On the other hand, I also look at the picture of the Falling Man and know that this man has a family. A family that will forever be traumatized by this day and the loss of him. This picture feels to me like an invasion of not only the Falling Man's privacy, but of his family's privacy because the whole world is invading and commenting on their personal tragedy. This picture is almost too personal for the world to tear it apart with its words, and because of that, it could also be seen as unethical. 

Overall, I honestly don't know whether graphic content is ethical or unethical. Graphic content affects people in a way that words by themselves cannot, and it can bring about a lot of positive, ethical change. However, graphic content can pry into people's personal lives and share a part of their struggle that they do not wish to be shared, which can have negative, unethical repercussions. I hope that moving into the future we as journalists can find a way to perfect this balance so that we are doing the most good for the world. 

Leave out important details, control the story.

 Christopher Riley
cr451912@ohio.edu
3000riley.c@gmail.com

Journalists have an obligation to seek the truth. It is important for them to understand that the public has a right to that truth. Too often we see journalists report video or images in a manipulated manor that helps them advance their own motives or beliefs. There are many reasons why this could happen. Are they being paid by specific political bodies? Or do they simply want their own opinions to be the common ones among society? The bottom line is stories get manipulated through visual communication way too often and something must be done about it. It violates many ethical codes of journalism.

 



Photo courtesy of SOTT.net

 

This image is a prime example of video or imagery being manipulated to control the story. Nick Sandmann was immediately vilified as racist and privileged for this simple image. It is because left leaning news networks controlled the story by not covering the whole story and only showing the public the part that makes the conservative look bad. A deeper dive into this story and fulfilling their duty to seek the truth would have prevented this situation from escalating the way it did. The way the story was covered made Sandmann public enemy number one. His only crime was smiling.

Here is an article from Fox News that helps puts CNN’s coverage of the situation into perspective: https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnns-joe-lockhart-attacks-sandmann-as-snot-nose-entitled-kid-following-networks-defamation-suit

CNN would later add more to the story as it developed. Here is an updated article as more video became available: https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/21/us/maga-hat-teens-native-american-second-video/index.html

 



Photo courtesy of Newmansociety.org

 

In the end, CNN settled a defamation lawsuit with Sandmann. However, the damage has already been done. The problem presented here is that with CNN jumping the gun in order to control the story; the public opinion of Nick Sandmann had already been solidified. This is the danger of trusting viral videos. They almost never provide clear context of the video. We only get to see mere moments and not the events that lead up to the situation in the first place. This happens with more than just political confrontations, we also see it with encounters between maskers and un-maskers, customers, and associates, and in plenty of road rage videos. When videos and images of confrontations go viral with limited information and major news networks only reporting a part of the story whether intentional or not; the story has already manipulated the public which is a major violation of ethics in journalism. This kind of reporting must stop, or it will divide our country even farther than it already has been.

Saturday, September 18, 2021

Fake News Is Real and This Where It Comes From

 Christopher Riley 

 


 
Image sourced from South China Morning Post 

 

Fake news has grown rapidly over the past four to five years. Maybe the idea of fake news has grown rather than actual fake news. You can point fingers to many things about where the idea came from. Liberals will always blame Donald Trump for pushing “unfounded” claims of fake news even though most of the claims have merit. Conservatives will always blame liberal media for pushing so called fake stories to fit their own narratives. No matter which side you agree with, or even if you fall somewhere in the middle, the idea of fake news has become more relevant than truthful news. However, we need to think about the way the media and journalists report the news. It’s not about reporting the news and holding political figures accountable like the ways of the past. It’s now about being the first to report the story and shape the public opinion on the subject to fit their idea of the truth. This is the true source of fake news.  


A prime example of this is how the media reported the ISIS drone strike in Kabul last month. News and media outlets jumped on the story, gathering a lot of their information from social media rather than real journalism. They were in a race with each other to cover the story and get the public to share their narratives on the subject before more information came to light. The story blew up and it became widely accepted that it was a successful strike. Here is NPR’s original story about the incident:  


 


Only recently was it revealed that the operation was a mistake and civilians were killed in the operation. Now imagine the story if all of the facts were known before the story broke. To be fair to all sides of the news media, not everything was known. However, it does not excuse reporting false information, especially now that the truth has come out and it is hard to find stories about it. Here is one from Reuters: 


 
Original image from SuperLuchas.com, sourced from Meme Monkeys 



This is only one example. It is astonishing how often this happens. Media outlets take any bit of information they can get to pass it off as news in order to push their own ideas. Liberal media has been caught doing this a lot in attempt to smear the former President Trump because they did not like him. This is why he pushes them for fake news. The claims are not unfounded. On the other side, conservative media has been caught doing the same thing to their political opponents. It’s a never-ending cycle between conservatives and liberals, but it is definitely real. It all comes down to reporting news with limited information. It is when the gaps get filled in that it becomes fake news. Then it is shared by millions of people on social media. It is a very real epidemic and needs to be stopped somehow or faith in the media will never be restored.