Yesterday, the mother of Bianca Devins filed a lawsuit against Oneida County in New York State along with officials for its “reckless dissemination of evidence” to media. Devins’ murderer videotaped him stabbing to death Ms. Devins. He also videotaped them having sex before he killed her. Clark posted disturbing and graphic images of Devins on Snapchat and Instagram which led to others reposting the images.
Journalists and media platforms have a moral obligation to determine the purpose of posting graphic images, videos, or photos. Vicki Kruger in a July 11, 2017, article in Poynter describes 11 questions to ask before sharing graphic videos and photos. Questions include will the posting help explain a story or provide a benefit to the community? Is there an alternative to posting the content? When do you cross the line when appealing to an audience’s desire for details? How do you respect the privacy of the victim and family?
One has to question the reliability of photos due to manipulation. Photos can be cropped, retouched, and modified making it difficult to tell if the image is real or not. A very small percentage of journalists and media companies have and use social media verification tools. A need exists today to develop more tools to determine if a photo has been manipulated.
People deserve to know the truth and not be manipulated by false news stories or images. Graphic images create a moral struggle. Those who post such images need to think about what benefit is being provided while respecting the dignity of the victim and their family.
HI Greg,
ReplyDeleteIv've seen this picture before in the news and totally agree with your comments with the photo manipulation through editing skills and great logic for the article!
Yichen Wei