gp420718@ohio.edu
It is hard to discuss Astroturfing without first addressing
the cleverness of its name. Astroturfing is an artificial grassroots movement,
that is funded by a corporation or affluent organization rather than something
that is community driven. The difference here is that an astroturfing movement
is packaged to look like it was created from much more meager means.
Virgil Scudder sums up this situation perfectly when he
says, “Employees will almost always behave in a manor that they think
management expects.” If management
pushes for the good of the company above the good of the public, there are
inherent ethical concerns. Clandestine marketing can look like a natural plan.
The most general aspirations of marketing and branding are
to raise awareness of the organization. Companies like McDonald’s and Coca-Cola
pay a significant amount of their operating budgets to make their organizations
immediately recognizable, sometimes with just a color or simple icon. In
astroturfing, however, this is not the goal.
The tobacco industry is involved, which should not be
surprising. This is not meant to directly question the integrity of the tobacco
companies because, quite frankly, their disregard for public health is already
well known. That aside, there are so many restrictions on cigarette advertising
that the only thing that might make sense for them is to go undercover.
Like Americans Against Food Taxes was not created by actual
concerned Americans, the National Smokers Association was not created by a
group of organized smokers, but funded by the tobacco industry. In this vein,
it has been suggested that this has stretched to political parties. The Tea
Party, according to the Huffington Post, may have been started, or at least
influenced, by astroturfing practices.
The problem here is that these astroturfing campaigns look
real. Something that begins with “citizens for,” has the sound that a group of
people who had concerns and decided to do something about it. There is a degree
of nobility to the sound, and that does not mean that everything that is
grassroots is necessarily false. In fact, grassroots have changed history, as
evidenced by the success of Barrack Obama’s campaign, which was fueled by
genuinely concerned citizens.
John Oliver states, “Astroturfing is a serious threat to our
public discourse.” It is an easy hiding place for someone looking to plant
self-serving seeds, and make it look like it is someone else’s idea. The
concept itself—albeit devious—has a certain level of brilliance to it. It is
like getting what you want, and making it seem like you are doing a public
service in doing so.
I just posted something about “Astroturfing in Russia,” but let's not forget that astroturfing is as American as apple pie. It was first invented in America, it became most popular in America and is only now spreading like wildfire to the rest of the world. According to Wikipedia, the term is derived from AstroTurf, a brand of synthetic carpeting designed to resemble real grass. A play on the word “grassroots,” it involves the misuse of fake media campaigns supposedly at the grassroots level that focus on brainwashing people (the hoi polloi) about something they have never heard of and have never supported before. Astroturfing is most often funded secretly by big (and greedy) corporations, powerful agencies of the federal government and anonymous donors (people with deep pockets) aiming to sway unsuspecting and ignorant public opinion.
ReplyDeleteRossen Vassilev Jr.
rv727716@ohio.edu