Rebecca Marion
rm812416@ohio.edu
https://newmediajournalist.wordpress.com/tag/photo-manipulation/ |
I may not be O.J. Simpsons biggest fan, but that doesn’t
mean I condone how news organizations manipulated his photo and forced a narrative on readers. In fact, I believe that drastically altered images take
more away from a story than they give.
Part of a photojournalists job is to grab the reader’s
attention through imagery and communicate meaning with a few to no words. This
makes the job photographers do a difficult one when they balance the pressure of
deadlines with paying bills and finding the time to spend with family and friends.
Is it truly any wonder why photojournalists are tempted to alter images to
create a narrative of their own?
According to this week’s reading, “Distorted Picture,”
technology meant to make the jobs of journalists easier are being misused and
now pose a threat to the creditability of photojournalists and the publications
that print their photos. In a world where internet access can make finding the
truth a lot easier than ever before, Journalists are being held accountable for
any perceived wrongdoings more than ever before.
Allan Detrich, the former photographer for the Toledo Blade, said
it well when he said, “I wasn’t the first to tamper with news photos and, unfortunately,
I probably won’t be the last.” Getting caught cost Detrich his reputation and
he left the newspaper a month after an investigation revealed that he had
submitted dozens of doctored photos.
Unfortunately, Detrich hasn’t been the only photographer
under fire for manipulating photos. During the 2015 World Press photo competition, more than a few images were disqualified because they were digitally
manipulated. This prompted the World Press organization to create a code of ethics
for photographers to follow if they intended on entering the following year.
The World Press furthered its quarry into the subject by
creating a survey that was completed by around one-third of the contest’s
applicants. The survey found that of those who replied to the survey, admitted
that they submitted staged photos into their editors.
Years ago, I used to wonder why anyone would risk their integrity
and reputation for the sake of completing a job. Now, I understand that the
field is journalism never falls short of being demanding and time-consuming.
Pressure doesn’t excuse dishonest, but it can help everyone
else understand the weight of the shoes they fill. Journalism isn’t perfect and
it never will be, but if we communicate with each there is no solution that cannot
be found.
Rebecca,
ReplyDeleteIt is amazing how powerful this image still is today. Your post hit on some of these key issues, and was very well done.
Greg (gp420718)
Rebecca,
ReplyDeleteI very much agree with you. Images can be strong tools to educate or deceive audiences. It really just depends on how much a photographer or news station wants to gain ratings.
Visual images are such an easy way to grab somebody's attention, and it's kind of scary to know that some people are in control of the way their audiences see content.
-Billy
It's so long since those images and magazine covers have been out and they're still jarring to look at! Great job on covering the ethical controversies behind the camera. It's scary to think of how many undisclosed manipulated photos and videos we might've seen till date, and we have no idea!
ReplyDelete