Amanda
Ehrmantraut
ae513115@ohio.edu
Source: news.softpedia.com |
As online media continues to become the
most prevalent source of news for most people, astroturfing grows more and more
widespread and harmful.
Companies and organizations utilize astroturfing
by secretly sponsoring certain campaigns or messages to make them appear as though
they are started by “grassroots” participants. This misleading practice causes
media consumers to believe that support for a certain movement or product is
far more common than it truly is.
Astroturfing has occurred for a long
time, but with more and more people trusting influencers and activists in this
online media climate, it tends to sway public opinion much more effectively.
Fake social media accounts can be easily
created and updated. Humans can even later be “assigned” to these accounts, maintaining
the façade of realism. There is even more advanced software that creates fake
IP addresses and makes organizations’ deception nearly untraceable.
Astroturfing campaigns are hard to
catch, but there have been a few notable busts. When Australia
was looking to pass legislation that would result in plainer cigarette
packaging with emboldened warnings and hazards, it was met with disapproval by
the Alliance of Australian Retailers, who argued these changes could harm small
businesses. It was eventually revealed that big tobacco companies were
financing the AAR.
On a smaller but more political
scale, a Twitter account that supported Toronto’s ex-mayor Rob Ford was
discovered to be run by his very own staff.
McDonald’s had a record-setting line
outside the store for its new Quarter Pounder burger, but that was because it
paid people to stand there.
Astroturfing is sometimes
detectable, but it will never be possible to catch every instance. For this
reason — and many others — it is important to take everything at face value and
form your own opinions on every major issue. A group or campaign coming out in
support or opposition of something may cause you to second guess, but always
remember that you do not really know that group’s true motive.
Trust in media has declined, but trust
in others has spiked a little too much. If you are looking for a new
restaurant, you may check its online reviews, and they determine whether or not
you choose to dine at that restaurant. Someone on Twitter posts an exposé
thread against a business. You are shocked by the company’s actions or views
and vow never to go there again. It is likely that you do not personally know
the restaurant reviewers or the author of the Tweets. Still, you trust them,
because their accounts have a name and a face. These experience must be real,
and their words must be true. It is important for us to realize that this is
not always the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment