Bobby Urse
bobbyurse2@gmail.com
Graphic by bestresponsemedia.com.uk |
These campaigns that are initiated or controlled by a concealed group or organization is a new type of "fake news" that is hard to discern from an authentic movement. They not only spread the false impression of real public perception but promote biased and unfounded narratives for political or monetary gain.
The immediate dangers of astroturfing were apparent during the Covid-19 epidemic as privately backed protests pushed misinformation while even potentially transmitting the virus further. According to spectrumlocalnews.com a rally in the Texas capitol of Austin saw hundreds of people calling for the lifting of Covid-19 related restrictions. The protest was technically a product of astroturfing as it was later revealed to be initiated by Infowars host Alex Jones.
Artificial protests like this not only give the wrong impression as to how real people feel about current issues but any mass gathering during a global pandemic is irresponsible from a public health perspective. Individuals or corporations on any political side should be held responsible for this type of action as it is not only tactless in the current health environment we are experiencing but knowingly inflates tensions by spreading a fake narrative.
Political astroturfing can make polarization between the two parties worse by conflating real public perceptions with privately backed ones. Doing all that while also spreading a virus? Two strikes in my book. But are political organizations the only one knowingly participating in the use of astroturfing and furthering the spread of misinformation? Unfortunately not.
Businesses of course also use forms of astroturfing to push their own agendas. Whether it be to shift public perception or to increase monetary gains. The New York Times article The Best Book Reviews Money Can Buy, estimates that about 1/3 of all online reviews are fake.
These practices only hurt consumers by propping up dishonest products with inflated reviews.
Astroturfing clearly directly impacts people both through the politics they hear and the products they are recommended. Practices like this are frowned upon but still very hard to catch, with the real intent behind being exposed days or weeks after, if ever at all. More skepticism is required by citizens but is not enough as there must be some federal regulation to increase transparency in these cases.
Hey Bobby,
ReplyDeleteThat is pretty incredible that people would use ploys for political or monetary gains like the stuff that happened in Austin. There is a video circulating now of Fb of Sasha Baron Cohen speaking at the Anti Defamation League about social media as the 'largest propaganda machine in history,' and the need for changing policies and priorities. I think it relates to some of what you're talking about. Carpe diem! - Jeff
https://www.adl.org/news/article/sacha-baron-cohens-keynote-address-at-adls-2019-never-is-now-summit-on-anti-semitism