Katie Millard
km053019@ohio.edu
Photos and videos are seen as an accurate glimpse of reality, a moment frozen in truth. However, one angle, moment, or frame is not always the best representative for an occurrence. An Australian National University study found that people trust photos. An article is more likely to be considered factual if accompanied by any photo, even a stock image. Photos are no longer just worth a thousand words; they're worth the difference between trust and a lack thereof. Photojournalism is an essential part of telling a story, and so it must be ethical.
With so much technology and interconnectedness, images are easily doctored and shared. Even videos can be altered to appear authentic, sometimes making it difficult for even professionals to decipher. Thus, it is essential that journalists always check, double-check, and confirm that anything they are reporting on with the weight of their publication behind them must be accurate. If something is circulating the internet, verify the source. If one can be sure it is true, it can be reported as fact. If one is sure it is not valid, an article debunking it.
Without covering a largely-believed falsity, it is essential to do so without furthering the false narrative. Readers casually scrolling are very susceptible to taking their feeds as fact. A University of Warwick study found people are generally awful at detecting falsified images. With only 9% of readers able to identify if something had been added or subtracted from an image. Thus, it is essential to include clear markers as to actual and untrue, as indicated below.
Michael Zhang for PetaPixel https://petapixel.com/2017/07/20/people-really-bad-spotting-fake-photos-study-finds/ |
No comments:
Post a Comment