Megan Carnahan
mc054910@ohio.edu
Constant Change
Media are ever-changing. In a technologically developing
world, we must adapt to new advances and ideas in the way we, as reporters,
present ourselves. We are constantly adjusting the five Ws in journalism:
Who is considered a journalist?
What news should be reported?
When should we release this news?
Where can we spread the news?
Why should people care and listen to our news organization?
Pros and Cons of the
Developing World
In the "State of the
News Media-Online Values Survey" article,
many, many people (journalists, citizens and others) are split on how they
view the current condition of the news media. About half of news-interested
people think that the Internet is “changing the fundamental values of
journalism” and is loosening standards and inviting less careful reporting.
I tend to disagree.
Photo courtesy of http://internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/ |
It is inevitable that with change comes even more change,
but I don’t think that the Internet is making us just “throw out” our
fundamental values. There are some positives about the technologically
advancing world that people need to realize. The Internet allows us to use
pictures, videos and articles; It allows us to connect to viewers around the
world and attract new audiences.
In the The Huffington Post's Parents section, a mother writes about how the Internet helped her connect with mothers all over the world to fight her postpartum depression, as well as posting pictures of her daughter growing up so her distant family could see her.
In the The Huffington Post's Parents section, a mother writes about how the Internet helped her connect with mothers all over the world to fight her postpartum depression, as well as posting pictures of her daughter growing up so her distant family could see her.
Not too long ago, none of this could happen.
Bloggers Can Be
Journalists, Too?
In my opinion, I say yes, but with some stipulations. I
apply these stipulations with every other writer, reporter, journalist and all
the other news gatherers out there. These media folks must act ethically in
their work, unlike Crystal L. Cox, who abused journalistic ethics.
In the article, "Judge
Clarifies that Bloggers can be Journalists (Just Not One in Particular),"
Judge Marc Randazza stated that
Crystal L. Cox did not fit the criteria of being a journalist. She posted
profanities, defamatory statements, and released names and personal information
of certain people she was covering. This obviously is not how an ethical
journalist should act.
On the flip side, bloggers everywhere can look up to video
blogger Josh Wolf. He served 226 days in jail, longer than any other
journalist in U.S., history for protecting source materials. As a result of him
“upholding the principles of a free and independent press,” he was named
Journalist of the Year in 2006 by the Society of Professional Journalists. He
also made some states reconsider their shield laws to add “blogger” under the
category of journalist.
“Onions have layers.
Ogres have layers.” & Journalism Shall Soon Have Layers
“Layered journalism” will soon be a more familiar term to
hear. It is something that I am definitely for. Journalism will be layered
horizontally, in which different forms of journalism will be brought together,
(print, broadcast, online, photography and so much more). It will also have a
vertical aspect, mixing many layers of the different types of journalists out
there. There could be citizen journalists and bloggers, freelancers and
commentators -- whatever combination you can think of.
Photo courtesy of www.sodahead.com |
I believe that this concept of “layered journalism” will
bring about a great convergence of ideas and people, only to make the
distribution of news and stories that much better. Though some traditionalists
may disagree, I have high hopes for the way media is transforming. As long as
we, as journalists, keep our ethics and morals in mind, we will hopefully
convert these changes of the media into encouraging and favorable news
conditions for the public to believe in again.
No comments:
Post a Comment