Kathryn Cook
kc133410@ohio.edu
The following articles ("Want to Stop Mass Murder" by Christopher Hanson and "Crimes Best Coverage Now Requires Constantly ‘Feeding the Beast’" by David J. Krajicek and Debora Wenger) all concentrate on the harsh concept that the journalism field will constantly
be changing. As technology grows and national tragedies occur we as journalists will continue to speak to the truth to the public. Everything that lies beneath
the truth is what journalist will struggle with from the public.
Lets begin with technology. As social media continues
to grow the journalism field keeps up the best it can, but its growing so fast
a 15-year-old girl can barely keep up. From the small stories to the big
stories things are easily leaked or misinterpreted through social media. As
David J. Krakicek and Debora Wegner point out, journalists are fighting to get the story to the
public before someone in the public does. The public is a huge competitor for journalists
due to witnessing an incident or gaining information from an inside source a
journalist might not have access to. Cracked.com calls out the media on stories
they released claiming to be true that were clearly fake. Some of the stories are
humorous stories you would never believe, then there are the stories published
that could cause panic or worry with the public.
When social media
leaks information it is hurtful and deceiving at times, but it is often helpful, especially
for how high social media is on this generation's priority list. The generation
today doesn’t watch the news or pick up the newspaper; their free time consists
of Facebook posts and tweets. When a tragedy occurs and tweeters ask their
followers to pray for the tragedy and hash tag it, it catches a follower on
Twitter's eye.
Tweets are now forcing the younger generation to turn on the news to
see what horrific tragedy has occurred. As the journalist and media cover the
story they get emotionally involved; the stations know the public has the TV on, waiting for updates of the story. So what about after the story has been
published or broadcasted? When do the families and friends affected by the
tragedy have time to mourn or recover from the tragedy that has occurred?
Christopher Hanson focuses on the media’s obsession of getting comments, photos or material to keep their viewers watching and interested about the tragedy. This coverage is over stepping a personal level, and I believe as a journalist I would take a person’s feelings in a tragedy more seriously than just getting another story. The article "Coverage Rapid, And Often Wrong, In Tragedy's Early Hours" focuses on the early influence of tragedies and makes a valid point that sometimes it is too early to be discussed. The media should focus on getting the truth out of the tragedy and stay out of the personal side of the tragedy that has occurred.
Christopher Hanson focuses on the media’s obsession of getting comments, photos or material to keep their viewers watching and interested about the tragedy. This coverage is over stepping a personal level, and I believe as a journalist I would take a person’s feelings in a tragedy more seriously than just getting another story. The article "Coverage Rapid, And Often Wrong, In Tragedy's Early Hours" focuses on the early influence of tragedies and makes a valid point that sometimes it is too early to be discussed. The media should focus on getting the truth out of the tragedy and stay out of the personal side of the tragedy that has occurred.
No comments:
Post a Comment