Alexandra Newman
an077811@ohio.edu
I think being objective is a very important part of being a journalist. It’s one of the first things you learn. It’s a good skill to have to make your stories stronger. The conflict comes in when you’re not sure what to call something, or you’re not sure if you should report something because it is so scandalous.
an077811@ohio.edu
I think being objective is a very important part of being a journalist. It’s one of the first things you learn. It’s a good skill to have to make your stories stronger. The conflict comes in when you’re not sure what to call something, or you’re not sure if you should report something because it is so scandalous.
An example that comes up often is whether or not to call the
Affordable Care Act “Obamacare." I have written several stories in which I talk
about the Affordable Care Act. I start out by saying, “The Affordable Care Act,
also known as Obamacare.” Then I continue to call it Obamacare throughout my story.
I made this ethical decision because I felt like most
Americans just know it as Obamacare, and it is easier to say over and over again
in a story than the Affordable Care Act. I didn’t think I was adding any bias at the time. After reading this article about weather or not to call it Obamacare, I realized that maybe the use of it makes it seem like you have an
opposition to it. I actually don’t, and find it funny that I still find myself
using the term just because it is easier.
Just because something is easier, does it make it the right
thing to do? I am all for taking the easy route, but in a news story you’re not
always getting your strongest story out there. You can make up quotes from
people who don’t exist, you can Google something until you find the information
instead of calling someone who would know the answer off hand, and you
can even make up false details to add more to your story, but all those
things are wrong to do and unethical. They may be easier than going out and finding
the answer yourself, but when you’re a journalist you are trusted by many to
report in the best way you can.
I think being objective comes into this idea of doing stuff
the easy way. When you’re doing things fast and just throwing a story together
you tend to only include a bare minimum of details. If
you took some time to look into the story and spend more time finding all of
the sides of the story you may find that there is an
angle you would have missed it you didn’t take the time to look into the case
fully.
Here is an example of a reporter who made comments quickly, without having actual proof to back them up.
In this case he lost his job over the things he said. He wasn't informed enough and jumped to conclusions based on his opinions, not actual facts. So before sitting down to write a story, or put a package together for television, make sure you:
1. Have every side to the story possible.
2. Don't let your opinions intrude.
3. Don't take the easy route.
Please take these things into consideration during your journalistic career. I do.
No comments:
Post a Comment