ar224811@ohio.edu
In this digital age, belonging to a social network has become
an integral part of people’s lives. Interestingly enough, social media has crossed the line to the professional world as
well. This development has forced journalists into deciding what roles social
media can and should play in their job. One way that social media has changed
the landscape of journalism is by providing a immensely larger pool of sources
for stories and materials. Another way is by confusing the way that journalists
and sources should interact.
SOURCING
When big events take place, journalists can search Twitter
and Facebook for raw footage or comments to use in order to quickly report on
events not occurring nearby. Although useful in getting information out fast,
crowdsourcing on social media can provide unreliable sources and possible wrong
information. There have been numerous cases where live tweeting has caused the
situations to escalate and spread falsehoods. One example took place at the
Tucson shootings in 2011, when news
spread that Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was dead. She was later
confirmed to be alive.
Beating other news outlets to big stories has always been
important in journalism, but social media has taken too far. I think that
because it is our job to report the truth, it is vital that we take the steps
necessary to confirm facts before we share them with the public, even if it takes
a little longer. Especially, because even if you retract or correct something
you posted, there is a chance that those who saw it will not see the correction
and will go on believing what you had previously posted. Moreover, if your
wrong information spreads to other outlets, then the information will look to
be authentic since other people are also reporting that wrong fact.
Also, when using social media as sources journalists should
get permission to share perceived private information. Sure, getting by privacy
settings is easy to do. But the ethical thing to do, is to be considerate of
people’s right to privacy. Asking or informing a source that you are using
something they posted or shared, is the right thing to do.
In the end, journalists need to do the job that they always
have done, even with the changing digital era. Do the research necessary to
report correct information to the public and verify sources.
SOCIALIZING
So what to do when your sources start to request you as a
friend on Facebook or start following you on Twitter? Well some people will
make separate personal and professional accounts. Others choose to not friend
sources or keep their account private. I feel that having sources as friends or
followers on social media is acceptable if you have separate accounts or are
willing to censor your account and how you relate with sources. It is important
to maintain your profile appropriate because most information is vulnerable to
being spread to more people than you wish. Thus, taking
precautious steps and making sure you do not post anything you do not want
to be associated with, or that could threaten your job or credibility is the
smart thing to do. Also know your audience and stay away from controversial or
political topics. This way you can engage your followers and share information
that pertains to you and your interests without causing troubles and bringing
unwanted criticisms.
There is no way to escape social media these days, but there
are ways to better use it as a resource and to manage accounts. So far, there
are no set guidelines, however, journalists should use common sense and common
courtesy when involving social media in their profession.
No comments:
Post a Comment