kk500312@ohio.edu
Henry (Michael Keaton) and Alicia (Glenn Close) in The Paper
(Source: johnrieber.com)
Ron Howard’s The Paper explores the many ethical dilemmas that arise in
journalism. The ethical dilemmas in the film range from the personal issues of
a news organization’s employees, to the reporting of breaking news. In
analyzing the ethical dilemmas that were present in the film, I referred to the
Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics. I will address and analyze
the ethical dilemmas regarding the first principle of this Code.
“Seek Truth and Report It”
Under this principle, the Society
of Professional Journalists asserts “Ethical journalism should be accurate and
fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and
interpreting information.” Throughout the film, journalists covering a story
about the arrest of two African-American boys and the murder they have
been blamed for. When lead character, Henry gets a tip that the police are covering up
something about the case he interviews a police officer. Throughout their
interaction, the police officer is unwilling to cooperate, yet leads on that he
has information central to the case. Henry threatens to knowingly run wrong
information if he does not cooperate.
This is an ethical dilemma in that Henry must decide whether to remain professional and cover the story without his statement, or push the source for information using underhanded methods of gathering information. According to SJP’s guidelines, a journalist should “avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information unless traditional, open methods will not yield information vital to the public.” In this instance, the police had information that was vital to the public: the teenagers were wrongly arrested. Under SJP’s standards, Henry can still act ethically while gathering information in this unconventional manner.
This is an ethical dilemma in that Henry must decide whether to remain professional and cover the story without his statement, or push the source for information using underhanded methods of gathering information. According to SJP’s guidelines, a journalist should “avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information unless traditional, open methods will not yield information vital to the public.” In this instance, the police had information that was vital to the public: the teenagers were wrongly arrested. Under SJP’s standards, Henry can still act ethically while gathering information in this unconventional manner.
By the time Henry learns the boys
were wrongly accused, the original article without this information had gone to
print. Henry attempts to hault the printing of the incorrect information and
restart with the updated story. However, Alicia, a journalist that works above
Henry, argues that the story was not wrong when it went to print due to the
fact that they did not have the information at the time. Henry retorts that the
news organization has “never knowingly published a wrong story” until this
instance.
The ethical dilemma that arises in this scene is whether to run an article that or to spend the energy and funds to reprint a story that could simply be corrected the next day. Also under this first principle is the guideline that journalists should “Take responsibility for the accuracy of their work. Verify information before releasing it. Use original sources whenever possible.” In referring to this guideline it is apparent that the ethical choice is to reprint and run the correct story in the first place. In knowingly publishing an incorrect article, the news organization would not be taking responsibility for the accuracy of their work. In addition, Alicia would be releasing information that is now unverifiable due to the new information available.
The ethical dilemma that arises in this scene is whether to run an article that or to spend the energy and funds to reprint a story that could simply be corrected the next day. Also under this first principle is the guideline that journalists should “Take responsibility for the accuracy of their work. Verify information before releasing it. Use original sources whenever possible.” In referring to this guideline it is apparent that the ethical choice is to reprint and run the correct story in the first place. In knowingly publishing an incorrect article, the news organization would not be taking responsibility for the accuracy of their work. In addition, Alicia would be releasing information that is now unverifiable due to the new information available.
By the film’s resolution, most of
the ethical dilemmas that occur are settled with reasoning similar to the
guidelines provided by the Society of Professional Journalists. The ethical
dilemmas in The Paper are not uncommon among real news organizations and
journalists.
No comments:
Post a Comment