Tyler Jordan
tj249713@ohio.edu
Diversity and the Lack of Representation
Source: rushlimbaugh.com |
Journalist Bias
The concept of Journalism being a
form of reporting and disturbing news in an unbiased and factual manner seems
to get skewed more as each month goes by. It seems almost like this notion the neutrality
equals professionalism is impossible, especially when you consider the rhetoric
used by our president and the laundry list of fake news permeating throughout journalism.
If this notion is true in modern journalism, then journalists should feel some
sort of relief in that they will be allowed to express their feelings on certain
events without the burden of possibly damaging their career. Unfortunately,
this sentiment has shown not be true, or at least it varies for different
people.
Jemele Hill's suspension
Jemele Hill was suspended for two
weeks after tweeting about Trump being “unqualified and unfit to be President”
and “a white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself with other white
supremacists.” Where the problem lies isn’t in fact that she was punished for
saying these things, but the fact that she made these claims on her personal twitter
account. While some would say Hill was in the wrong for making these comments
as a journalist, one could make the argument that Hill should be allowed to
share her opinions in a space outside of work, especially when she is part of
the group of people being affected by the Trump’s actions. This decision by
ESPN, if anything, just highlights the lack of diverse representation within
these journalist networks. This is particularly noticeable when you see how
other networks have treated similar situations.
Geraldo Rivera and Fox News
Take this for example, in 2015 Geraldo
Rivera made this comment live on Fox News after seeing Kendrick Lamar’s BET
performance of the song Alright. “This
is why I say that hip-hop has done more damage to young African-Americans than
racism in recent years. This is exactly the wrong message,” Rivera said.
Following this comment Rivera received a response for Lamar, but no reparation
from Fox News. If we analyze his comment with Hill’s, in severity terms, both
are generally equal. Rivera’s comment could easily be seen as an unfair generalization
of hip-hop and an insensitive assumption about the racial bias that negatively effects
an entire group of people. At the same, this comment was made live and could
easily be perceived by viewers as the general attitude of the network. Looking
at it from that stand point it would make sense for Fox News implement some
sort of retribution against Rivera for making such a bold statement, but
nothing came about. It could be assumed this happened because Rivera was represented
by a staff that valued him or the people associated with him shared this
opinion and regardless were willing to let risks slide
Therefore, these should be more
representation within these networks for journalists and their beliefs. If one
network is willing to let a journalist’s opinion slide then, the other networks
should react differently in similar situations. I’m not saying you should pick
sides, but there should be enough representation to have set decision across
the board of all networks.
No comments:
Post a Comment