Thomas Carberry
tc173113@ohio.edu
For any publisher, editor, writer
or consumer of the news advertising is at its core a necessary evil. Publishers
and editors rely on ads for revenue to fuel the paper, but advertising is
becoming harder to find for print and has proven to be an inefficient revenue
stream for digital. Consumers are regularly annoyed by ads that pop up out of
nowhere and linger for far too long, but they wouldn’t be able to receive the
content for nearly free without those ads.
Yet people do not often think of
the woes ads themselves cause for advertisers. These of course are not ads the
advertisers made but rather fraudulent ads, ones that have been injected into
websites without permissions. Fraudulent ads come in many forms and are quite
pervasive on the internet. Many of the ads that disrupt you from reading your
morning articles are indeed fraudulent. In most cases ad fraud hurts only the
advertisers by tricking them into paying more than they ought to for ads that
haven’t truly been viewed.
There is quite a variety of forms
of ad fraud but the most pervasive form is bots. Bots are pieces of software
that perform actions automatically. Bots are supposed to trick advertisers into
believing that real users interacted with their content. At first bots were
simple, predictable and therefore easy to detect, but bots have gotten much
more complex and can now mimic human behavior. Bots are now complex enough to
fill out forms and watch videos.
Image source: https://adcumulus.com/blog/ad-fraud-types/
However, many forms of ad fraud are
carried out by humans. The most common form of ad fraud directed by actual
humans is the click farm. A click farm is a large group of low-paid workers who
click on ads all day without truly viewing them, so that advertisers are forced
into paying for ads that weren’t beneficial. This can be detected by locating
where the large concentration of clicks is coming from, if the clicks are from
a developing country such as India then there is a good chance it’s ad fraud.
Hiding ads is another common form
of ad fraud. This is mostly done by stacking ads on top of one another so that
when a user views one ad they are actually viewing multiple, and the advertiser
is stuck paying for unseen content.
Ad injection is when someone places
an ad on a website without the publisher’s knowledge. This form can be rather detrimental
to both advertisers and publishers because the ad that is injected into the
website replaces an existing ad that the publisher is getting paid to present
to their audience. In this case publishers seem to stand to lose just as much
as advertisers.
Domain spoofing is when scammers
are able to sell ads to low-quality websites by dishonestly presenting them as
high-profile, trustworthy websites with content that is applicable to the ad.
This form hurts both advertisers and publishers because the advertiser pays for
unwanted ad space and publisher does not get any of the money for the ad, the
scammer does.
No comments:
Post a Comment