ab015511@ohio.edu
The news cycle for our modern day is a 24/7 cycle. Breaking
news is around every corner. Editors now have near minutes to decide whom and
what to report on. This tragic case highlights the dilemma of how to report on
the victim.
We, as journalists, walk a very fine line when it comes to
reporting on the victims in the media. As journalists we try to focus on
minimizing harm for the victim, while giving our readers the full and fair
story. Victims of tragedies often become
overnight “celebrities” in our world. Where is the line drawn on respecting
their privacy, but also reporting a good story?
Source: Google Imagines
The Good
The media is not always a bad thing. There have been many
times when a victim or a victim’s family has used the media spotlight to shed
light onto the issue. They use the media
as a voice to share their own thoughts and opinions. Take, for example, the Conradt
family of Oregon. Their son Max was a football star. During a game in 2001, Max
suffered from a concussion that caused permanent brain damage. This family and friends used the media to
draw attention to the issue. The were
able to use the media to gain support for
“Max’s Law” which requires coaches to have annual training on how to
recognize concussion symptoms and remove an athlete suspected of a concussion.
The Bad
The cameras are always rolling when it comes to news.
Sometimes though it is not so great for the victims. As journalists, we must
try to keep the victims feelings in the back of our head while reporting and to
keep in mind that the victim is still trying to cope with something horrible
that has happened to him or her. Unfortunately, this does not always happen.
Take, for example, the shootings at Sandy Hook in Newtown, CT. One of the victim’s
mothers wrote a blog on the 1-year anniversary of the tragedy. In the blog she
says, “"I will be honest, I hate when the media comes into
town. I don't like seeing their vans with large satellite dishes parked on
every corner. I don't like reporters bothering me to comment or give interviews
about the 'latest' findings with the case. I don't like seeing my daughter's
picture on the news associated with her violent death. “.
The media often times can open up old
wounds that the victims are trying to heal from.
What do we do?
So how do we handle this? How can we not hurt the victim,
but still report on the facts? Frank Ochberg,
a professor at the Michigan State University School of Journalism, runs the
Victims and Media Program. In a blog post, he explains that we must take the
greatest care of our victims. He wrote that we must defend the victim first,
before we can take action.
I believe
that when deciding to report on a victim, you must consider the victim first.
We must decide if this report is going to harm the victim more than help. This
will then allow for the reporting of the story in the most sensitive nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment