Sabrina Fawley
sf339111@ohio.edu
The History of Journalism
Authors, Kovach and Rosenstiel, mention in the
article that modern journalism emerged in the early 17th century from
public places; in England newspapers grew out of coffeehouses and in America journalism
grew out of pubs. These examples of how the news media formed in the
17th century reinforce the idea that community and news cannot be separated.
Journalism Today
Today
journalism looks differently than it did 300 years ago. The media in
today's marketplace has over grown the pubs and coffee houses where news was
once shared to only a set amount of people. Today, there are a variety of ways
for people to acquire news, and each news
medium is constantly competing for the public's interest over a competitor.
Over the years, the media has
been able to reach larger amounts of people than ever before, but at the same
time the traditional "old" media has (in a sense) grown smaller
because of the many mergers and acquisitions that have overtaken the media landscape.
New technology has created a surge in "we
media" and the "new media" that has risen to popularity in only
a short number of years (e.g. Huffington Post). "We media" and newer
media outlets have flooded the Internet and mixed with more traditional/older forms
of media. We are now in a world where anyone can produce news content that the
public can see. During this time in history, the journalist's job is no longer
based on the concept of being a "watchdog." The journalist's job is to
help the public makes sense of information they are given which may bring up
the question: Is the purpose of journalism the same?
Basics Still the Same?
There are many different sources for news today, and
people have a limited amount of time in which to understand the news. This
means journalists need to adapt and become more resourceful when telling people why news matters, while still keeping their individual
journalistic conscience. Journalists have the moral obligation to cover news in a way that will makes it newsworthy and not sensational by telling
those consuming the medium why a story really matters to the public.
The concept of the moral compass and ethics still exists today,
even though the relationship between traditional media and "new media" has changed.
Richard Sambrook of BBC News stated that the terrorist
bombings in London in 2005 permanently changed the news' relationship with "we
media." He said it was a "tipping point."
Photo Credit: jacksonsun.com |
According to Poynter, Tom Curley, president of the
Associated Press, said that the Associated Press has accepted how important citizen
journalism is for more than a century. Curley said that the only difference
between then and now is that the amateur/witness content has become more
pervasive than ever before.
The authors, Kovach and Rosenstie, remarked that every generation creates its own
journalism. Kovach and Rosensteil added, "the purpose and the underlying
elements of journalism are the same." Those underlying concepts, "to
provide citizens with the information they need to be free and self-governing," are the reasons why traditional journalism will never disappear. People still need
the resources that traditional news possess.
No comments:
Post a Comment