Markita Briggs
mb702210@ohio.edu
Recently in our Ethics, Mass Media and Society course we had to evaluate the similarities and differences between the codes of ethics from various journalistic outlets. Though all these different outlets have distinct purposes, almost every code included quite a few of the same principles. One in particular that was prominent throughout was the idea of a journalist’s independence. The Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics defines independence as being free of obligation to any interest other than the public’s right to know (here). With this comes avoiding conflicts of interest, both real and perceived, in addition to refusing gifts, favors or special treatment that may compromise one’s journalistic integrity. Most of us would like to believe that all journalists have resisted these kinds of temptations, but unfortunately many have not.
mb702210@ohio.edu
Recently in our Ethics, Mass Media and Society course we had to evaluate the similarities and differences between the codes of ethics from various journalistic outlets. Though all these different outlets have distinct purposes, almost every code included quite a few of the same principles. One in particular that was prominent throughout was the idea of a journalist’s independence. The Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics defines independence as being free of obligation to any interest other than the public’s right to know (here). With this comes avoiding conflicts of interest, both real and perceived, in addition to refusing gifts, favors or special treatment that may compromise one’s journalistic integrity. Most of us would like to believe that all journalists have resisted these kinds of temptations, but unfortunately many have not.
Cash for Words
After reading the article, I was utterly disgusted. The fact
that any journalist would think it is okay to take money to provide or offer it
to receive information is demeaning to the field as a whole. Instead of
sticking with traditional methods of obtaining facts for a story, they take the
easy route and use bribery to persuade sources to give them what they are
looking for. What they fail to realize is that by using bribery methods, they
not only lose credibility, but their sources do as well.
(Photo credits to http://www.saach.tv/)
Resist the Whistleblower
The truth cannot be rightfully obtained this way. As said in
the Columbia Journalism Review’s article, “Checkbook Journalism’s Slippery
Slope,” once money enters the reporting equation, it has the potential to
corrupt the whole journalist/source relationship. But without using such scandalous methods, scandals themselves may not ever be
revealed. This was definitely the case with News Corp and their UK property
paper, The Sun (here).
Their systematic payroll to officials was completely against
the standards of journalism. To them they saw nothing wrong with paying off
who they refer to as the “whistleblower” if that’s the only way they can get the
information they need. People with
important information sometimes don’t want to talk unless there’s something in
it for them, even if it’s a public or upstanding official who should know
better. Instead of remembering the position that they have, they risk their
job's respectful position because of greed. However, the journalist is the one
who shouldn't give into this greed.
Paying for information for your media outlet
could eventually lead to public distrust. Even though you may reveal a story you felt the public should know, you did so by using the same
sneaky methods that those involved in the scandals you covered did.
As a result, not only could you lose your credibility within the industry, but
you look like a hypocrite as well. The equal-playing field of journalism cannot
be maintained if certain outlets are using unconventional
methods to tell their stories. If we want to be respected within and outside our profession we
must not risk our independence and stick to the traditional methods of getting
a story, no matter how long it takes.
No comments:
Post a Comment