Raquel Devariel
rd3201614@ohio.edu
It’s the twenty-first century, and technology is at its
peak. Pretty obvious by now that not only millennials, but also baby boomers and
even older generations, are taking part in world-wide conversations through the
web.
Everyone has a voice that can be heard through the different
social media outlets. Whether it’s through Facebook, Twitter or your favorite
social medium you are connected to what’s happening around you.
But, if you’re like most readers, you don’t even bother to
open the links your friends or followers share. You let yourself get information
from the small synopsis a header can offer.
In a world where sharing information is extremely easy, as a journalist, how do you stand out from the crowd?
In recent years, journalists have created connections and
engagements by trolling their readers with headlines, which has proven to be extremely
effective.
The Columbia Journalism Review, in its article "Stop trolling your readers," calls these hate-share headlines, which are meant to generate
public dissonance and infuriate the readers. After successfully generating
those reactions, journalists know that most of the readers will click or share the
article.
Little do they know that they have fallen for it because the
article might not even be talking about what was mentioned in the headline. However,
it has served its purpose of getting views and engagements, which then leads to
more profit for the company.
Could it be possible that journalists are falsely
advertising their content for views?
Are we, as journalists, putting our credibility at risk just
to generating a couple more bucks?
As the American Advertising Federation says in their Code of Principles and Practices for Advertising Ethics, “The latest research from the Adweek Media/Harris Poll shows
that only one in five Americans trust advertising most of the time and 13% say
they never trust it,” which could become one of the most important statistics
for the news and information industry.
Crossing to the “other side,” the advertising world, can
result in more profit, but is it worth it to lose your credibility for more likes?
This is a question that we journalists have to ask
ourselves on a daily basis.
Taken from: http://stroudassociates.com |
In my opinion, technology no doubt has made it difficult for
us to stand out and for us to deliver news that stands out from the clutter, but
we should use this reality as a motivation to succeed at what we do.
We need to use this to encourage ourselves to create exceptional
content that will stand out regardless of the headline it comes with, and then,
this is how you prove your success.
Creating stories that mean something and stories that no
matter how busy or lazy readers are, create a spark of curiosity that leads not
only to a click or a share, but also create a difference and impacts the lives of those who read and inform themselves.
Next time you are about to publish a story, ask yourself are
you an advertiser who has lost their credibility? Or are you a journalist who upholds the standards of the industry and delivers relevant and important
information?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete