Natalie Chatterton
Nc322312@ohio.edu
In today’s society Journalism, the media and ethical
reasoning do not have a great reputation when spoken together. We have seen
this reputation tarnished through coverage of protests, government officials, and
more recently the presidential election. This reputation is also due to issues like confirmation bias. In the assigned reading titled Moral Reasoning for Journalist
by Steven Knowlton and Bill Reader, these authors state “the broad assumption
seems to be that journalism ethics is
a contradiction in term. Yet, research today suggests journalists today are more
concerned about professional ethics than in any time in the past."
If research suggest journalist are concerned about ethics, why does this industry still stand with a negative reputation?
In today’s society, most individuals retrieve their news and
information online, which is a great way to reach a max amount of audiences almost
instantly for news outlets. So you can imagine the competitive spirit for news
and media to be the first source with the information. This rat race causes
issues among online users and credibility.
One recent incident we can review is the Pulse Night Club
shooting in Orlando, Florida.
When this tragic shooting occurred, immediately journalists and news outlets took to social media to document what they thought they knew, prioritizing
prominence over accuracy. An article titled 10 Things The Media Got Wrong in Reporting Frenzy Over Orlando Shooter by Virgina Kruta explained that the posts
online varied from what weapon the gunman used, the gunman’s motive, whether he had accomplices, to even tweeting the body count of the massacre. These posts
and tweets were all inaccurate in certain ways at the time of the post, spotlighting
the stigma between moral reasoning and journalism.
The Ethical issues among this case are clear, the journalist
and news outlets were more interested in having the information first that they
sacrificed moral reasoning, and credible information for their reputation in
the middle of a tragic massacre.
The terrorist attack in Paris, France qualifies as another great
example of how credible journalism on social media is put behind stories that will
receive more publicity.
In an article by CNN titled Debunked: What Social Media Got Wrong about Paris Attacks by Kerry
Chan-Laddaran and Justin Lear, the authors explain certain instances that
projected completely false information. For
example, in the article Chan-Laddaran and Lear explained “A video titled ‘Muslims
around the world celebrated the Islamic victory in Paris, France, ‘purportedly
showed a crowd of young Pakistani men dancing and waving their nation's flag
outside a London tube station.” When in fact this video of the men dancing was
after Pakistan won a cricket match in 2009.
The media portrayed that instance to millions and millions
of people on social media who were following these attacks. Having information
like that misconstrued to the public is an ethical dilemma within this industry. This field is focusing more on the entertainment aspect of news and information
and disregarding ethical and sincere moral reasoning to communicate important
and, most significantly, accurate information to the general public.
https://sharesilentlyoutloud.wordpress.com/tag/citizenship/ |
No comments:
Post a Comment